I Am (Not!) 154

Hi all. Today’s topic for Friday Faithfuls is IQ testing. This topic is very dear to my heart, as IQ tests have often been used and even more often misused to determine my entire life path.

When I was twelve, I had an IQ test administered to me. It was the verbal half of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children (the performance half can’t be administered to me because of my blindness). On this verbal IQ test, I got an overall score of 154. According to the educational psychologist writing the report, this is a sign of giftedness.

There were several problems with this assigned IQ score. For one thing, like I said, it’s just a verbal IQ score. The year prior, another ed psych had tried an intelligence test for visually impaired children which utilizes non-verbal components, but had given up on the test midway through because I got too frustrated. This ed psych had also administered the verbal half of the Wechsler scale, but her report doesn’t give an IQ number.

Another thing, which you might figure out from my previous paragraph, is the possibility of a retest effect, since I took the exact same test twice in a year. The ed psych that labeled me with an IQ of 154 did try to find out whether this had actually happened. He asked me whether I had been told when taking the test the last time which answers were correct and which weren’t. I had, in fact, with some, and besides, my father had given me extensive advice on how to answer some questions even more cleverly than I had done. However, I knew the purpose of this assessment: to get the green light for me to go into mainstream, high level secondary education rather than special ed for the blind. I wasn’t at the time really sure whether that’s what I wanted, but my parents did and I, being twelve, didn’t question their authority. So I said “no” and the ed psych concluded there was no retest effect.

I don’t doubt that I have an above-average verbal IQ. But 154, in my opinion, is probably too high. Besides, verbal intelligence is what you need to succeed in traditional schoolwork. What you need to succeed in life, is more related to performance IQ, if you ask me.

Even now though, nearly a quarter of a century later, the number 154 pops up here and there and everywhere with regards to me. Professionals keep assigning new dates to the original IQ score, calling it a total rather than verbal IQ, and making more nonsense out of these ever-intriguing three digits.

I have tried to talk to the behavior specialist about this. What I really want is to be re-evaluated. Not just with respect to (verbal) IQ, but with respect to other things too. She for now only agreed to write a note by the IQ score of 154 saying that it dates back 25 years.

You’d assume that, in intellectual disability services, it wouldn’t matter whether your IQ is 100 or 150, since it means no intellectual disability regardless. However, several of my current staff have admitted being wowed at my IQ score before they got to know me. I hate that the most, being reduced to being 154.

5 thoughts on “I Am (Not!) 154

  1. I always figured that you were intelligent Astrid from reading some of your posts. Nobody wants to be labeled something that they don’t feels fits them and I am sure that your life is difficult enough without have to face this number 154 that keeps popping up. I think it is a good idea for you to go and get another test to see what that shows.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for your kind comment. Yes, I initially agreed to have that number put into my care plan because I was clueless about its consequences in intellectual disability services. Like I said, I thought all that mattered is that I’m not intellectually disabled, but I was wrong.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. When I read your texts, I think of you as an intelligent person, but
    nothing more and nothing less. Such an IQ test is only a registration at
    a certain moment in time, almost like a photo. In time photos change
    colour under influence of light. People do change too under influence of
    their circumstances and other people they get in touch with.
    There are people who are good thinkers, there are creative persons etc.
    Each person is worth while: not because of what he/she says and does,
    but for what he/she is in total, as a human being.

    Take care,
    Roelie

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for your kind words. Thanks so much in particular for saying that last bit. I agree completely. However, I was raised in a family where you were only worthwhile because of your achievements, and my performance on that IQ test was one such achievement.

      Like

    2. Roelie:

      loved that comment about influence and about light.

      [in reference to photographs and people – I know that some IQ tests emphasise analogies in a big way – the Weschler only does that in Similarities and some bits of Comprehenshion].

      And how those do not change a person’s worth – but only the perception of that worth in self and in others.

      And because a test is a snapshot – it does not capture change.

      It MAY identify a situation which needs to change.

      Yes – circumstances and other people do change us a lot!

      [I know they have me].

      Like

Leave a reply to Astrid Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.