I feel so awful right now. The visit from my parents went so well and this is actually confusing me. I mean, I consider some of my childhood experiences traumatic. Quite a few, in fact. How can this be the case if I have such loving parents? I mean, yes, they’re still a bit odd. My father just talked about the birds and butterflies and flowers we encountered. He didn’t ask me any questions or share anything about himself. That doesn’t make him a CPTSD-engendering parent though.
I had a dream yesterday about me needing to take the SCID-D assessment for dissociative disorders and it came back showing that I don’t have a dissociative disorder. It was probably triggered by my having read a message in a DID support group about how plurality is now something anyone can claim because of endogenic (born multiple) systems etc. We’re not an endogenic system, but can we claim to be traumagenic? Can we even claim to be a system at all?
I mean, other than online and to a few specific people who know us closely, we don’t share our names. It could just be that I gave names to different emotions or aspects of myself that I find hard to understand. This is what my community psychiatric nurse said on our last appointment. She said the consultant recommending EMDR for my traumatic experiences hadn’t recommended any type of “deep-digging” therapy. Not that I want that, but on some deep level (no pun intended), her claim that my parts are feelings, made me feel invalidated.
I told my CPN that, whichever treatment approach I try, my parts always show up and disrupt the process. She countered that we hadn’t tried EMDR yet. I know, but this approach is known to cause worsening of dissociation in those with dissociative disorders. Can it get me to “split” even more, even if I’m not a genuine multiple in the first place?
When I shared my doubts/denial on an E-mail list for DID, someone replied that I sign my E-mails with lots of different names. Well, that’s as easy as typing on a keyboard. No-one needs to have any special characteristics to be able to do this. It doesn’t prove my multiplicity. Besides, I know there are parts and they have names, but are these parts truly differentiated enough?
In a sense, it doesn’t matter. I’m not planning on seeking a DID/OSDD diagnosis anytime soon and by the time I might have overcome my fear of psychological evaluations, I guess DID has been removed from the DSM. Either that or Onno van der Hart and other scandalous therapists have given it such a bad name that no-one in the whole country will support me. And that’s even assuming that said assessment would show some type of dissociative disorder. Then again, if I’m claiming plurality for the sake of it, am I not contributing to the stigma surrounding DID myself?
In addition to the dream I had yesterday, I have recurring dreams about my parents finding out I’m in childhood trauma survivor support groups. They always confront me and my husband always sides with them. I guess I should leave those groups in case it really happens. I mean, I’m not an adult child of normal parents, maybe, but then again who is?
I would think that whether you have multiple fully differentiated personalities or multiple distinctive subpersonalities, the difference would be more about semantics than actual experience.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for sharing your opinion. That makes sense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope all is well for you soon, yes, it was a good visit with your parents but even though it’s a bit confusing is was a good thing. Hugs from all of us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much. Yes, it’s confusing indeed but I’m trying to focus on the positive.
LikeLike
We’re a mixed-origin system that is both traumagenic and araisagenic (formed through escapism).
Being unsure about origins is pretty common, and it is okay to not know for now.
The stigma that comes with DID and plurality as a whole is because singlets don’t understand how it works with things like system responsibility and often cannot wrap their heads around how disordered and non-disordered plurality can be a struggle. It’s an unknown to them, and being a system that does not fit in a DID or OSDD-1 diagnosis does not contribute to that.
Sometimes, things just do not fit in those boxes, and an update to the DSM-V in 2013 added the clause “and/or traumatic events” to the diagnosis criteria. Trauma is not required to be a system, and that is okay.
– Delphi, W/5+ Names
LikeLiked by 1 person
Also, I apologize since I only now saw the date of the post. – Delphi
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for validating us and no problem about the date of our post! -Sierra
LikeLike