Hi everyone. For my letter B post in the #AtoZChallenge on personal growth, I’d like to discuss the five-factor model of personality, also known as the Big Five.
The Big Five are five personality traits that psychologists think comprise the human personality. These were proposed based on factor analysis of words people use to describe someone’s behavior. Apparently, these five traits encompass all aspects of the human personality.
Unlike with some other personality typologies, the Big Five isn’t a dichotomous system. Rather, the traits are a spectrum ranging from one extreme to the other and everyone falls somewhere along the spectrum on each trait.
The traits are commonly summed up in the CANOE or OCEAN acronym. They are:
- Conscientiousness: efficient/organized vs. haphazard/careless.
- Agreeableness: sympathetic/cooperative vs. cold/competitive.
- Neuroticism (or low emotional stability): moody/nervous vs. relaxed/calm.
- Openness to experience: imaginative/philosophical vs. uncreative/unintellectual.
- Extraversion: bold/energetic vs. shy/bashful.
As you can probably see, most of these traits are not formulated in a morally neutral way. For example, it’s often seen as better to be efficient and organized than to be careless. As such, a high score on all subscales (except for neuroticism) is generally seen as desirable.
I took a Big Five test once when in college and scored badly on all subscales except for openness to experience. Then again, there was a validity scale too, which scored how much you tend to answer in socially acceptable ways even if this isn’t genuine. On this subscale, I scored such that it’s likely that I rate myself more negatively than I am.
How valid are the Big Five in actually assessing someone’s personality? Studies have shown that they can be measured, but whether these are the real or only important personality traits, is still up for debate. For example, some researchers have suggested a sixth trait: honesty vs. humility. Do you notice how this one is actually worded in a morally neutral way?
Cool post! I agree, a lot of these tests seem to have connotations of judgment, even when they are claimed to be neutral. And you do have to factor in how honestly people tend to answer them.
Happy A to Z! 🙂
<a href=”http://multicoloreddiary.blogspot.com“>The Multicolored Diary</a>
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for commenting. Honestly, the Big Five model seems more judgmental than most others I know.
LikeLike
This is interesting, I didn’t know of this big 5, thanks for enlightening me!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting. I had heard of it in college, but had forgotten most of the things I learned back then.
LikeLike
Thanks for the wonderful information. I was looking for some kind of easy way to have my neurotic heroine classify herself and you’ve sent me down the road I needed. Hope you don’t mind if I pinch this idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t mind at all! I’m just so glad my post offered something of value to you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your posts are always interesting. I enjoy reading them even when I can’t comment because I’m on my phone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aw, thanks! That means a lot!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve run across the Big Five before and found it helpful, with that big caveat that the two poles aren’t morally neutral which only encourages judgmentalism, something I try to avoid.
Also, I feel like these could be seen as journeys. For example, I’ve worked to develop more calmness and to be a bit more extraverted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s an interesting take, you seeing them as journeys. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
Besides have tendencies with these 5 basic traits, I think where one falls can also be situational. I agree with Joy that our tendencies are a journey.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very well-said indeed. Thanks for stopping by. Somehow, your comments landed in spam but I’ve been able to recover them.
LikeLike
I agree the bias towards judgment is a concern. I’ve not heard of this testing model before – thanks for the intro. I look forward to your other posts in this series. Happy challenge!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for commenting. I agree the judgment factor is a problem.
LikeLike
I like how you explain what it is, what you see as barriers to neutrality, and how you relate personality to this assessment tool.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. I’m glad you appreciated my post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, Astrid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found your post interesting and I agree, so judgemental! I know how to answer questions to cause myself the least problems, so that would be a real problem if I cared.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I see. The validity scale is there to solve a bit of that problem. In case you don’t know what it is, a validity scale, sometimes called a “liar scale”, has questions on it that are judgmental in nature but that are really meant to trick people who think they know how to answer favorably, because people who answer honestly, would admit on that scale that they do some things that aren’t socially appropriate. Like I said, I scored in such a way on the scale that indicates I actually rate myself more negatively than I am.
LikeLike
Never heard of the big five, reading through them they seem a bit judgy in my opinion and as you may know I am not a judgemental person but that said it was an interesting read
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, agree about the judginess in them. Thanks for stopping by.
LikeLike
I’d never heard of this before. But those five are some good traits to pay attention to.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. Thanks so much for commenting.
LikeLike
Learned something new today. Thanks for sharing
LikeLiked by 1 person
So glad to read you learned something new. That’s one of the positives of the #AtoZChallenge.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good grouping of traits, but I can see why adding the sixth one would be beneficial. More good information to know, thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting. I agree that sixth trait has some value.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person